Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/10/07 14:04
Read: times


 
#130561 - Neil, I kind of agree
Responding to: ???'s previous message
The bigger the project the better HLLs look.

I would phrase it this way "The bigger the project the higher perecentage of the code will be in a HLL"

The bane of all this is the argument "assembler or C". what is wrong with "assembler and C".

I do not, any more, start out in assembler, but if I run into something critical (like I have to transfer serially 2500 bits from xdata to a port pin in 500usec) there is nothing like assembler.

My current "wisdom" is "if not time critical use C, if C is fast enough, use C, do not refrain from assembler when needed".

Erik

List of 35 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Code transform from A51 -> C51 Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
   I don't think so, I'm afraid            01/01/70 00:00      
   there is NO WAY you can do that. C does not, in a            01/01/70 00:00      
      You are right I can't be sure            01/01/70 00:00      
         API            01/01/70 00:00      
            The problem is with the API development...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Welcome to the world of cross-platform development            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Use A51 compiled object files in SDCC...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Did you say what you mean?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Yes I was actualy meaning GENERATED...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  About inventing time in make...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Inventing            01/01/70 00:00      
                     well, since you hide your e-mail (the 8052 e-mail            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Please, please could you send it?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Unix utilities for Windows            01/01/70 00:00      
                        SDCC paths            01/01/70 00:00      
               The 'C' preprocessor            01/01/70 00:00      
               if you use a sensible approach it is easy            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I don't know about 'easy'...            01/01/70 00:00      
         HLL's are for people who are too lazy ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            re: HLLs are for people            01/01/70 00:00      
               what\\\'s He-Man?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Def: He-Man            01/01/70 00:00      
            ยต-controllers are for people who are too lazy ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               I don't want to discuss about HLL's effyciency            01/01/70 00:00      
               Oops            01/01/70 00:00      
                  dyslexics untie!            01/01/70 00:00      
            30% to 90%?            01/01/70 00:00      
               Neil, I kind of agree            01/01/70 00:00      
   You can be sure it does.            01/01/70 00:00      
   Code transform from A51 -> SDCC            01/01/70 00:00      
      This is also a thing I missed..            01/01/70 00:00      
         similar concept to MAC routines, locking to binary            01/01/70 00:00      
   is it possible ?            01/01/70 00:00      
      yes            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List