??? 03/02/07 19:10 Read: times |
#134137 - correct, but incorrect Responding to: ???'s previous message |
pulses that are faster than 1 ms (which would mean your plate would be moving at speeds around 80 inches/second)
correct in a perfect world. However in the real world with such an arrangement I have seen pulses of less than 0.5 uS due to the effects that happen with minuscule mechanivcal jitter when the sensor is at the edge of "the plate" as you call it. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Crystal Oscillator Accuracy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Its probably highly non-linear | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
commercial crystal oscillators | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You should tell us the speed of your moving object | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
speed of shock absorber | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Induced voltage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
calibration problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Calibration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
just a thought | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Temperature extremes of your watch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
good one Lynn :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Consider the following: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
correct, but incorrect | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
reconsider this... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I have seen far worse than this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
my thought | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the plate vibrates which it WILL do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
that will be big problem then | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I think Steve has it...![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |