| ??? 03/02/07 19:23 Read: times |
#134140 - reconsider this... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Staying within the context of measuring the speed of the device that is moving:
Even transient pulses that are faster than the given example can detect wouldn't hurt the accuracy by more than a pulse or two - on the scale of thousands of pulses, I don't think the "OP" will mind. Also, the word "plate" was from the OP...I imagine something larger than 2mm in diameter when I hear the word "plate", so I put it in quotes... :-) |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Crystal Oscillator Accuracy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Its probably highly non-linear | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| commercial crystal oscillators | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You should tell us the speed of your moving object | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| speed of shock absorber | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Induced voltage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| calibration problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Calibration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just a thought | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Temperature extremes of your watch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| good one Lynn :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Consider the following: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| correct, but incorrect | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reconsider this... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have seen far worse than this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| my thought | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the plate vibrates which it WILL do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that will be big problem then | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I think Steve has it... | 01/01/70 00:00 |