| ??? 03/03/07 00:09 Read: times |
#134172 - I think Steve has it... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
After hearing the application, I think Steve Taylor has the right approach. I didn't realize you were looking for that kind of responsivity!
I don't believe it would be practical to do it any other way... -Dave |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Crystal Oscillator Accuracy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Its probably highly non-linear | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| commercial crystal oscillators | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You should tell us the speed of your moving object | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| speed of shock absorber | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Induced voltage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| calibration problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Calibration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just a thought | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Temperature extremes of your watch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| good one Lynn :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Consider the following: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| correct, but incorrect | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reconsider this... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have seen far worse than this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| my thought | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the plate vibrates which it WILL do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that will be big problem then | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I think Steve has it... | 01/01/70 00:00 |