| ??? 03/28/07 16:16 Read: times Msg Score: +1 +1 Good Answer/Helpful |
#136030 - that solution looks OK on paper ... but ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
It's based on 555-timers, which are not terribly precise. Moreover, changing timing involves removal and replacement of passives, while doing the same thing with a small 805x will probably require just a little coding change.
There are small in-system-programmable MCU's that might offer an easy path which he can solder up only once, yet have the ability to vary the sequence and timing without further physical modification. Don't you think that's going to be easier than rewiring? RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Help! Microcontroller & xbox controller | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What did Google say? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A quick Google Says | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not really a first project | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Processor IC or LM558 non processor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Different tack! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that solution looks OK on paper ... but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OK, MY solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Multiple deletions | 01/01/70 00:00 |