| ??? 05/28/07 14:11 Read: times |
#139918 - timing Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Philippe,
I did not go through your whole code, but I noticed that you don't put delay between each change of state of SDA and SCL. That BurrBrown chip is pretty fast - are you sure you obey ALL timing constraints given in the I2C documents? Also, please note, that the I2C devices are required to be static. It means, that you should be able to change the state of lines very slowly, or even stop completely, or step through it "by hand" - and connecting 2 LEDs, you should be able to see what happens on the bus. Again, when you go back to full speed, please observe the timing between EACH change of the lines' states. JW |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| I2C eeprom 24c02 byte write stuck in ack | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| timing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| timing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what\'s the problem, exactly? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| timing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how do you know that? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How do you know that? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| do you have some other version of code? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| do you have some other version of code? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A work around For That | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| work around For That | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well in my guess, you have same problem:-) as mine | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Polling the 24C02 EEPROM for ready | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OOPS wrong logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I thought that I should try your code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Polling the 24C02 EEPROM for ready | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| great, but do not forget to mention | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The Clock | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
addition - show the full picture - 'edit' to above | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i2c function signatures | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hello friend | 01/01/70 00:00 |