Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
07/05/07 19:34
Read: times


 
#141516 - SI Units
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Lynn Reed said:
I have never seen 1 KHz = 1024 Hz.

But you know that a 1K byte memory has 1024 bytes - not 1000 bytes?

Strictly speaking, an uppercase has no meaning in the International System of Units ("SI Units") - so "1KHz" is just plain wrong.
The uppercase 'K' = 1024 is really just computing/digital electronics "slang"

The International System of Units ("SI Units") defines the lowercase 'k' to indicate a multiplier of 1000, and this was long established before the SI was formalised; eg, in kg, km, etc.

http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/rules.html
http://www.npl.co.uk/npl/refer...tions.html

In fact, the usage of the lowercase 'k' was well-established long before digital electronics came along - which was why the uppercase 'K' was chosen to indicate a multiplier of 1024 (convenient for binary systems), being close to 1000, but a little larger.

It's easy to remember: a big 'K' (1024) is larger than a small 'k' (1024).

Unfortunately, disk drive marketing materials often deliberately confuse the issue...

List of 24 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
How to generate 100 Khz square wave 80C51            01/01/70 00:00      
   Tips            01/01/70 00:00      
      1 KHz            01/01/70 00:00      
         that's ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         SI Units            01/01/70 00:00      
            1024 = Ki            01/01/70 00:00      
   C interrupt overhead            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: C interrupt overhead            01/01/70 00:00      
         and listen to the guru! :-)            01/01/70 00:00      
            several reasons            01/01/70 00:00      
               Yet another reason to avoid using HLL's!            01/01/70 00:00      
               Optimizations            01/01/70 00:00      
   Use Timer0 auo reload            01/01/70 00:00      
      using            01/01/70 00:00      
      interrupt vectoring vs. latency            01/01/70 00:00      
         Then the Interupt must be in ASM            01/01/70 00:00      
            do you mean...            01/01/70 00:00      
               No            01/01/70 00:00      
               Compiler generated IRQ vectors            01/01/70 00:00      
                  OOPS we both meant LJMP REALisr            01/01/70 00:00      
                  the original problem...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Interrupt Latency + Vectoring + Service            01/01/70 00:00      
   indufficient info            01/01/70 00:00      
   use MCS52 better option            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List