??? 07/06/07 14:49 Read: times |
#141554 - indufficient info Responding to: ???'s previous message |
from the 80c51 using the crystal 11.059 Mhz. ... can you correct my code for making 100 Khz
80C51 does not say diddlysquat, the days of the 'generic' '51 are long gone. some derivatives will have a T2, some will have a PCA, some ... till you state explicitly (manufacturer and all the letters and numbers on your chip, the answer is "who knows". Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
How to generate 100 Khz square wave 80C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Tips | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
1 KHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
that's ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SI Units | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
1024 = Ki | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
C interrupt overhead | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: C interrupt overhead | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
and listen to the guru! :-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
several reasons | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yet another reason to avoid using HLL's! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Optimizations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Use Timer0 auo reload | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
using | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
interrupt vectoring vs. latency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Then the Interupt must be in ASM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
do you mean... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Compiler generated IRQ vectors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OOPS we both meant LJMP REALisr | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the original problem... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Interrupt Latency + Vectoring + Service | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
indufficient info | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
use MCS52 better option![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |