| ??? 07/12/07 14:51 Modified: 07/12/07 14:51 Read: times |
#141813 - which I did Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I would use a local copy of Ralph in this case.
which I did Anyhow, as stated it was "for the purpose of 'looking' I inserted" and the place was not 'it', the problem was elsewhere. Since the switch was in the workloop amy 'miss' was picked up the next time around when default: was 'ignore'. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| more to atomicity and such | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Interesting example ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| which I did | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Aside: Keil - Atomic functions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you can afford it. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| volatile | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| does this have some formal definition? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sequence points and side effects | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what's exactly the value of volatile, then? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bu what is it good for then? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ok, visualize this one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| within a loop | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Memory Mapped I/O | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OK I see it now, thanks. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| volatile switch | 01/01/70 00:00 |