??? 07/13/07 09:13 Read: times |
#141843 - what's exactly the value of volatile, then? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
It does not ensure atomicity, apparently... Is there any example to show that in less than - as you mention - a lot of techtalk in C99 which I wouldn't understand anyway?
Or, putting the question in other way, is there any method to ensure atomicity "automatically", at least in cases where the "read only once in C statement" (whatever it means) applies? JW |
Topic | Author | Date |
more to atomicity and such | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Interesting example ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
which I did | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Aside: Keil - Atomic functions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
If you can afford it. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
volatile | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
does this have some formal definition? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sequence points and side effects | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what's exactly the value of volatile, then? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
bu what is it good for then? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ok, visualize this one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
within a loop | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Memory Mapped I/O | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OK I see it now, thanks.![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
volatile switch | 01/01/70 00:00 |