| ??? 07/13/07 12:28 Read: times |
#141850 - bu what is it good for then? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
OK I see (roughly) HOW it works if a variable is declared volatile, but what is it good for, then?
The common example murmurs something about interrupts, but for them obviously also atomicity is needed - what is the point of splitting these two things? JW |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| more to atomicity and such | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Interesting example ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| which I did | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Aside: Keil - Atomic functions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you can afford it. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| volatile | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| does this have some formal definition? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sequence points and side effects | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what's exactly the value of volatile, then? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bu what is it good for then? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ok, visualize this one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| within a loop | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Memory Mapped I/O | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OK I see it now, thanks. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| volatile switch | 01/01/70 00:00 |