| ??? 08/20/01 22:59 Read: times |
#14279 - RE: AT89S8252\\\\\\\'s EEPROM |
Yes, Peter and Jacek - But what about the compiler ?
The actual, Physical EEPROM is located at address 0. The compiler now thinks it is at 2000H. The results will not be correct. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| AT89S8252's EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252\'s EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252's EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252's EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252\\\'s EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252\\\\\\\'s EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252's EEPROM - J.Guy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252\\\\\\\'s EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s EEP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252's EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252\\\'s EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252\'s EEPROM Jacek | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252\'s EEPROM J.Guy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: AT89S8252's EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 |