| ??? 08/22/01 21:14 Read: times |
#14349 - RE: AT89S8252\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s EEPROM |
Hi J.,
I think, this special case only for the 89S8252 was not supported by any compiler. Also I use always another approach: In case, if the EEPROM was fresh (0FFh) or corrupted there was a routine, which load a default data set from the real code space into the EEPROM. Peter |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| AT89S8252's EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252\'s EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252's EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252's EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252\\\'s EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252\\\\\\\'s EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252's EEPROM - J.Guy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252\\\\\\\'s EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s EEP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252's EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252\\\'s EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252\'s EEPROM Jacek | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89S8252\'s EEPROM J.Guy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: AT89S8252's EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 |