| ??? 08/16/07 02:09 Modified: 08/16/07 03:40 Read: times |
#143325 - What exactly are you doing? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Steve said:
What are you actually calculating that takes 1 second? Yeah. I wonder the same thing. If you explain exactly what you are doing and how you are doing it, somebody may be able to spot some inefficiency. Or, depending on the application, there may be a quick, clever, "thinking outside the box" way to do whatever it is you need. Sometimes an approximation of some sort, or even a simple table lookup will save the day. Details. We love details. -- Russ |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Log and Exp routines | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Precision | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Log and Exp | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Tried FP51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Log and Exp | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Shouldn't take 1second | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What exactly are you doing? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| long not sufficient ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| as it should | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Mutually Exclusive? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Coprocessor? http://www.micromegacorp.com | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good idea - here's some more | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| does that make sense? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What you say ain't what you do. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why so touchy?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what "hidden agenda" | 01/01/70 00:00 |