Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
08/16/07 13:31
Read: times


 
#143339 - What you say ain't what you do.
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Hello Erik,

Does that make sense? Your sly remarks hide a hidden agenda. Why not just be direct and stop this unprofessional conduct?

The only real way to know if it is a better decision is to do a cost/benefit analysis. The price of this coprocessor chip is $20 with a 700% increase in speed. It is IIC interface so there would be no problem adding it to your slower CPU.

The cost of another processor chip (ARM) means new hardware and software tools. Learning the new IC takes a long time also.

The only person who would know if its makes sense is the original poster.

Regards,

Charles Bannister


List of 16 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Log and Exp routines            01/01/70 00:00      
   Precision            01/01/70 00:00      
      Log and Exp            01/01/70 00:00      
         Tried FP51            01/01/70 00:00      
            Log and Exp            01/01/70 00:00      
               Shouldn't take 1second            01/01/70 00:00      
                  What exactly are you doing?            01/01/70 00:00      
               long not sufficient ?            01/01/70 00:00      
   as it should            01/01/70 00:00      
   Mutually Exclusive?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Coprocessor? http://www.micromegacorp.com            01/01/70 00:00      
      Good idea - here's some more            01/01/70 00:00      
      does that make sense?            01/01/70 00:00      
         What you say ain't what you do.            01/01/70 00:00      
            Why so touchy?!            01/01/70 00:00      
            what "hidden agenda"            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List