| ??? 08/27/07 19:43 Read: times |
#143669 - Yes, but why? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jacob Boyce said:
Yes, I understand that part of it, but is there a way of passing info to the assembly routine without using R7 or R6, but instead using the data memory? If you're passing the value to the function, why would you want it in data memory? You'd have to store it in data memory in 'C', then grab it from its memory in your assembly code. Keil's convention makes sense because the value will be ready for you to work with in R6 and/or R7 when your assembly language code starts executing. Regards, Craig Steiner |
