| ??? 09/02/07 16:12 Read: times |
#143894 - not with MOVX... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
...where it misses a tick.
Daniel's problem was, that the 'S8252 ticked twice ("normally") during MOVX to an internal resource (EEPROM), and the recommended replacement, the 'S8253, did not. JW |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| ALE pin control | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| More information needed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nothing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Smart MCU | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it does not care | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Is it so | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| there is none | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Like it says | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dumb MCU! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I don't understand | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Neither do I! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Is that like | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not allways... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I hate to give ATMEL credit, ... but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not with MOVX... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Being more clear | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it seems perfectly reasonable to me ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, some of them... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
With ATMEL, nothing surprises me ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |