Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
08/28/01 11:03
Read: times


 
#14541 - RE: optical encoder, Bruce
Hi Bruce,

here two examples
(you have to copy them into an editor like notepad - sorry for the inconvenience)

both examples have their reversal point in the middle, Line A is considered the interrupt source for Alfredo's example.

A _==__==__==__==_
B __==__====__==__
+ + - -

A _==__====__==_
B __==__==__==__
+ - -

Now you see that the example below is off by one count for the same distance,
this adds up when moving back and forth.
applications that require high precision - like mill tables, automated scanners, chip bonding etc. won't get far when their positioning is off.
(a good digital glitch filter is a must btw)

As i said, for simple applications like a mouse for example this doesn't matter ecause you wouldn't notice if your little rodent counts wrong.

Cheers, Roger

List of 16 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
optical encoder            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder, Alfredo            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder, Alfredo            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder, Bruce            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder problems            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder, Roger            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder, Andy            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder, Fran            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List