Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
08/30/01 09:53
Read: times


 
#14613 - RE: optical encoder
Yes, the method I suggested is simple but not perfect. When needed, I add a state-machine in order to ignore any reversal movement if the wheel does not go forward to the next phase (signals switching) and vice-versa. But this requires polling both signals fast enough to detect every state-change.
I use to say that this problem with encoders is the equivalent, though different, to rebounds in switches.

Some manufacturers make encoders with 'movement' and 'direction' outputs, instead of the conventional A and B phases.

Fran: Neither Torrecedeira nor CUVI, at the E.T.S.I. Industriales.

Regards,
Alfredo del Río.


List of 16 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
optical encoder            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder, Alfredo            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder, Alfredo            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder, Bruce            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder problems            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder, Roger            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder, Andy            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder, Fran            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: optical encoder            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List