| ??? 10/04/07 20:24 Modified: 10/04/07 20:25 Read: times |
#145423 - the prefix is misleading in Intel parts! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Richard Erlacher said:
The number looks more like a Philips part number, though it probably has an Intel copyright label. IIRC, Intel preceded its part numbers with an 'i'. Intel used a number of different marking schemes, but, at least in the last 10 years when I was involved in buying certain Intel parts, the prefix indicated package and other options which most manufacturers indicate in suffix - and the "i", if it was before the marking, was there merely as a logo. An overview of the marking is on the Tekmos site, scroll down for "Intel Prefix Codes" table. I am sure I have seen a similar table directly on Intel's site but cannot find it now - those pages are really a mess. P is merely indicating a PDIP package here... JW |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Replacement for Intel P80C51FA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| P89V51Rx2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just grand Jan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I do not know about fully "drop-in compatible" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AFAIK, Atmel dropped the DIP40 package... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I do not know about fully "drop-in CORRECTION | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It depends on what you want! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the prefix is misleading in Intel parts! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks for the elucidation! | 01/01/70 00:00 |