| ??? 01/18/08 09:12 Read: times |
#149680 - Who has the lowest-power 8051s...? |
In another thread, I said:
I wouldn't be surprised if you could achieve a power reduction simply by switching to a more modern derivative [than an AT89C51]...?
http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=149678 Which does beg the question, who makes the lowest-power 8051-derivatives these days? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Who has the lowest-power 8051s...? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the answer heavily depends... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Benchmarks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| certainly... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Just like any other benchmark, then. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Something like this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I would like to know... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| did you see ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no, just | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 33uA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you could always... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| answered in semi-parallel post | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| one more in the semi-parallel thread | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This is often an academic question... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| wide supply voltage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i think it's Maxim ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but why would you do it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Speed | 01/01/70 00:00 |