| ??? 01/18/08 10:24 Read: times |
#149684 - certainly... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
... set by those who claim the lowest consumption chips; adjusted so that they support those claims.
Bah, I am so pessimistic today... :-) JW |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Who has the lowest-power 8051s...? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the answer heavily depends... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Benchmarks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| certainly... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Just like any other benchmark, then. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Something like this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I would like to know... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| did you see ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no, just | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 33uA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you could always... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| answered in semi-parallel post | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| one more in the semi-parallel thread | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This is often an academic question... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| wide supply voltage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i think it's Maxim ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but why would you do it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Speed | 01/01/70 00:00 |