| ??? 02/04/08 15:35 Read: times Msg Score: -1 -1 Off-Topic |
#150325 - Yes, it's unclear Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jan Waclawek said:
... the AT89S5x is apparently to be a sort of *bridge*, between the I2C-ish "2-wire" interface and the 1-wire desired by Ben, isn't it? Quite possibly so - see: http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=150299 But it could also be that he wants the AT89S5x to interface to both this 2-wire device and be a master to a 1-wire interface... And "1-wire" could mean anything using just a single wire - might not necessarily be the Maxim/Dallas 1-WireTM bus... etc, etc,... Better wait for Ben to clear this question first... Absolutely! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 1-wire protocol with AT89S5X | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's all here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Crying wolf | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1-wire Slave | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: Some of the timing may be to tight to bit bang | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Like I2C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Like I2C! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| read the @#$%^ website! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Who says those are 1 wire stuff??? ben | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but is sensirion a 1-wire device? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this one is - read the @#$%^ webpage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Which one ? SHT7x_ has 2 pins DATA ,SCK . | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, it isn't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ok, then... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AH, now I see | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, it's unclear | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why should we speculate ? Why shouldnt JBJ clarify | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sorry for late response..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Slave code is not published | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Other 1-Wire Interfaces... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Others | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sorry late reply..give up | 01/01/70 00:00 |