| ??? 02/08/08 05:00 Read: times |
#150433 - Sorry for late response..... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Sorry for late response
>In this case, are you saying that you need the AT89S52 to be a >Slave on the 1-Wire bus? yes,correct >Alternatively, you could use a DS2408 as the 1-Wire slave to >provide a parallel interface to your AT89S52... I didn't had the DS2408.and didn't plan to contact maxim for DS2408. > ... the AT89S5x is apparently to be a sort of *bridge*, between >the I2C-ish "2-wire" interface and the 1-wire desired by Ben, >isn't it? SHT75---AT89S5X--1 wire network. SHT75 had own signal structure..sample code to read it is ok.. the problem is after reading the SHT then the result will sent to 1 wire network..so yes..AT89S5X is the 1-wire slave. Is the softcode for MCS-51 didn't publish or created for AT89S5X? Thank's JBJ |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 1-wire protocol with AT89S5X | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's all here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Crying wolf | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1-wire Slave | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: Some of the timing may be to tight to bit bang | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Like I2C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Like I2C! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| read the @#$%^ website! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Who says those are 1 wire stuff??? ben | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but is sensirion a 1-wire device? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this one is - read the @#$%^ webpage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Which one ? SHT7x_ has 2 pins DATA ,SCK . | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, it isn't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ok, then... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AH, now I see | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, it's unclear | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why should we speculate ? Why shouldnt JBJ clarify | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sorry for late response..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Slave code is not published | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Other 1-Wire Interfaces... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Others | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sorry late reply..give up | 01/01/70 00:00 |