| ??? 02/20/08 09:06 Read: times |
#151195 - Comments Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Rather than use XBYTE, use _at_ to place properly-named variables at the required XDATA locations.
Otherwise, the tools don't know that those locations are in use - and will assume that they are available for general use as XDATA memory... |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Real Time Clock and other | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How to post source code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| post- source code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| internal XRAM? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| its not logical but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| modified code using UIF | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| UIP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Will get stuck | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you used _at_ instead of XBYTE .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Comments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reply to coments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| _at_ instead of XBYTE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| pin assignments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You still haven't answered the questions! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| xdata i/o | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just do it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Default | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sorry i can't reply due to my ill health | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| address | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| perfect!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| try to understand | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes i finally got the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Aside: Not a macro | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Delay? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil know | 01/01/70 00:00 |