| ??? 02/21/08 11:24 Read: times |
#151236 - Default Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Stefan Kanev said: (my emphasis)
In Your micro there are INTERNAL RAM locations, which compiler will address by default. That's not entirely true. To be precise, the compiler does absolutely nothing to control XDATA access on the physical hardware - it's not that the compiler imposes a default. In other words, the default is converned by the target hardware (possibly the chip itself) - not by the compiler. If your target hardware requires some specific setup for XDATA access (whether internal to the chip or not), then it is up to you to implement that - usually in the startup code. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Real Time Clock and other | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How to post source code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| post- source code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| internal XRAM? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| its not logical but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| modified code using UIF | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| UIP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Will get stuck | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you used _at_ instead of XBYTE .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Comments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reply to coments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| _at_ instead of XBYTE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| pin assignments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You still haven't answered the questions! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| xdata i/o | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just do it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Default | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sorry i can't reply due to my ill health | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| address | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| perfect!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| try to understand | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes i finally got the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Aside: Not a macro | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Delay? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil know | 01/01/70 00:00 |