??? 03/07/08 13:37 Read: times |
#151995 - Then again ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
If you can find a derivative that's cheap and fulfills most of your requirements, it might be worth it to think about adding the missing functionality (e.g. a second UART) as an external add-on.
Or, depending on your application, it might be possible to use a faster MCU with less ROM and optimize the program for size at the expense of CPU cycles. |
Topic | Author | Date |
P89C669 Obsolete, looking for replacement. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SiLabs, maybe ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A/D & D/A -> expensive ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
depends on volume | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
About 1 or 2 k/Y | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
talk to your SILabs distributor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Oh No, Ronneby is not on Gotland | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
STMicro, too. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
As sheap as possible | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Then again ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
P89C669 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
P89C669 also obsolete![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |