| ??? 03/11/08 13:57 Read: times |
#152119 - the cost of developing a bit banged IIC slave ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
... is a minimum of 2 bottles of aspirin.
A bit-banged IIC master is (besides potential overhead problems) quite simple, a bit-banged IIC slave is a true bitch. I guess that today I would simply refuse (i.e. quote an astronomical sum) if somebody tried to hire me to make a IIC slave using a processor without hardware IIC. In the olden days when no derivatives with HW IIC were available I achieved some of my follic challenge from designing a bit-banged IIC slave. Using a derivative with HW IIC, an IIC slave is "just another job" Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| soft I2C slave | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| pass on one bit of experince | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the cost of developing a bit banged IIC slave ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you want to find Public Source Code... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| like this.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Can you add a flip-flop? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Only 1 master and 1 slave..or | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what is the sensor? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why soft? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| GPIO/something else or micro | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Simplest way | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thank's Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Don't just thank me... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Many thank's | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| all SILabs, most NXP LPC9xx | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No Shortage!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Devices Found = 263. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| know of none | 01/01/70 00:00 |