??? 03/19/08 14:28 Read: times |
#152358 - know of none Responding to: ???'s previous message |
No doubt some of them will not have the I2C slave
I know of none that do not include the slave, but that does not mean that a check is not in order. One note: with the exception of the SILabs deviates (f3x-up) but including the SILabs derivatives (f0x-f2x) all I have seen can use the code generated by CodeArchitect (with minor modifications) Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
soft I2C slave | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
pass on one bit of experince | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the cost of developing a bit banged IIC slave ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
If you want to find Public Source Code... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
like this.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Can you add a flip-flop? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Only 1 master and 1 slave..or | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what is the sensor? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why soft? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
GPIO/something else or micro | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Simplest way | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thank's Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Don't just thank me... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Many thank's![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
all SILabs, most NXP LPC9xx | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No Shortage!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Devices Found = 263. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
know of none | 01/01/70 00:00 |