??? 05/16/08 14:24 Read: times |
#154821 - I agree Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Like Erik says get rid of the OE, it's really not necessary or desirable to use it.
Implement a Master / Slave arrangement, each slave should only respond if it recognises it's unique address, the slaves are NEVER allowed to initiate communications, only respond to requests from the master. Look at ModBus for example. And READ the information already indicated by Erik, it will help a lot to avoid the potential pitfalls. |
Topic | Author | Date |
RS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sorry about the subject-- I should ahve typed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
how do you expect that to work? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Send slave ID again.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
one transmitter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
maybe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Keep in mind that RS485 also... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'd get rid of the "OE" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
more to add | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
get rid of the OE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
how can slave turn OE line high? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
1 Suggesion to get slave ID | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
again: OE will not work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OE line connected , but not used | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
changes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Use ID as timer value | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Use ID as timer value wil not work ...![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |