??? 05/31/08 15:35 Read: times |
#155330 - No. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
You would need oscilloscope.
I don't even think that just a "pulse present" indicator would tell you anything useful - you'd need to see that the pulses are at the appropriate frequency, with the appropriate shape, etc, etc... |
Topic | Author | Date |
Testing AT89C52 using multimeter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
there is not much you can do with a multimeter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
fluke 112 be ok? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
partially agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the original question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
definitions ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
My whole point![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'd put off option 1 until option 2 is in effect. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why are you suspecting they couldnt work? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How would you program them? | 01/01/70 00:00 |