| ??? 05/31/08 20:56 Read: times |
#155336 - I'd put off option 1 until option 2 is in effect. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
You can't easily apply precise details acquired from one particular hardware application to another. However, you can attach your oscilloscope to nearly any of 'em. You can't "look inside" every IC, while you can use JTAG to "look inside" some parts of some of 'em.
The best thing to do is both options 1 and 2. A useable 'scope costs about what that SiLabs board costs. It makes it hard to decide, doesn't it? A properly functional board that uses a PLCC-44-packaged 805x costs only $40 at http://www.newmicros.com/ (look for NMIY-0031). That will allow you to verify all but the FLASH content. It also provides an environment within which you can generate and exercise programs in 'C', Forth, BASIC, and ASM. RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Testing AT89C52 using multimeter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| there is not much you can do with a multimeter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| fluke 112 be ok? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| partially agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the original question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| definitions ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
My whole point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'd put off option 1 until option 2 is in effect. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why are you suspecting they couldnt work? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How would you program them? | 01/01/70 00:00 |