Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
08/30/08 06:31
Read: times


 		 #157863 - it passed!
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Added two NOP to the LEAP routine to balance out the amount of times the number 1 was present and after 9,000 additional button presses the weight of the numbers balanced out.

Thanks for all your help everybody.

I'm hoping the next project, using a DJNZ command to create a 45 number random count, will have the same success. But that circuit is yet to be built. On paper a separate 8 bit processor does nothing more then do a DJNZ of the number and a reload. The main processor requests a number from the RNG processor by bringing a port pin low.

List of 28 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
8051 random numbers revisted - tested            01/01/70 00:00      
   Just Out Of Curiosity            01/01/70 00:00      
      yes casino            01/01/70 00:00      
   No fancy simulator required            01/01/70 00:00      
      Russ, great info here is MY code            01/01/70 00:00      
         Language-independent method            01/01/70 00:00      
            Oops            01/01/70 00:00      
               Head under arm            01/01/70 00:00      
                  HLL not an option            01/01/70 00:00      
                     HLL was just for example - easy to read            01/01/70 00:00      
         As always: The generation of random numbers ...            01/01/70 00:00      
          what is the need to CLR C            01/01/70 00:00      
            no need            01/01/70 00:00      
      does this solution make sense            01/01/70 00:00      
         Per's idea makes more sense            01/01/70 00:00      
         Don\'t use conditional jumps            01/01/70 00:00      
            Clever!            01/01/70 00:00      
      Converting Assembly to C            01/01/70 00:00      
   what about using the timer?            01/01/70 00:00      
      256 / 6 is a failure            01/01/70 00:00      
   One Suggestion for generating 1 to 6            01/01/70 00:00      
   try to use timer            01/01/70 00:00      
      yes a nice solution            01/01/70 00:00      
         How secure does this have to be ?            01/01/70 00:00      
            not much            01/01/70 00:00      
               Not "how safe?", but "how secure?".            01/01/70 00:00      
                  it passed!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     ALL THE BEST!!!            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List