??? 10/31/08 06:08 Read: times |
#159514 - Elaboration Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The ARM devices usually require a bit of code to set up the PLL etc. They usually have a more complex interrupt structure and more sophisticated peripherals. If you're comfortable reading datsheets and can understand them, go with the ARMs. The ARM offerings are predominantly 3V parts and surface mount. The CortexM3 variants are a little simpler than the ARM7 offerings, maybe look at Luminary Micro - they've got some nice eval boards at attractive prices and ST have a nice eval gadget for their CortexM3 parts. Download some datasheets and get a feel for what you have to contend with. When it's all said and done, most microprocessors are all much the same. Once you've learnt one, going to another is not such a big deal. |
Topic | Author | Date |
8051 versus AVR/ARM Risc? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I don't know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Care to elaborate? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Elaboration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Simple can be complicated! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
more features | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
real embedded system ?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
unreal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Go for anyone, or tell about end goal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
other uC families ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Again, what is your goal? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
We can't suggest without more info | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What ARM? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Any ARM from "reputed" manufacturer![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Whatever you do... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not really an answer, but .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
$14?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
a "toolstick" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Eight quid! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
or free | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OT: I wonder... | 01/01/70 00:00 |