??? 02/03/09 04:39 Read: times |
#161973 - How about some numbers? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Satish S Munot said:
Dear Sir(s)/Madam
I want to maintain speed of motor1 in proportion to other motor2. What is the speed? Is it less than 300 revolutions per minute? Is it greater than 50K revolutions per minute? Some External Logic (is) driving the Motor1 and Encoder is attached to MOTOR1. Is it possible to access this external logic, perhaps to get the master clock and divide it down, rather than processing the motor1 encoder output? Now Using Pules coming from encoder(Motor1) I have to run motor2 which some multiplication Factor. Is that multiplication factor constant? Your previous writing suggests that it is. Regards
Satish Munot Satish - I've made a few corrections in order to make your writing a bit easier to understand. Please don't take offense at this. I know English isn't your mother tongue. I did ask, in a previous post, whether it wouldn't be possible to make the motor2 speed the master and make motor1 make track it. RE |
Topic | Author | Date |
Frequency Multiplication | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what is the wave form shape of the original signal? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, PLL is the most promising solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Easy integer approximation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Wave Shape | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Constant speed? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Constant speed? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Constant speed? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Constant speed? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Still some outstanding questions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Perhaps you're looking at the wrong motor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Rate Multiplier | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That might work ... but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Frequency multiplier | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How about some numbers? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Frequency Multiplier | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I was afraid that was the case ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Frequency Multipllication | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What about that logic card? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Frequency Multipiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why no further relevant information? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I have been following this![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |