| ??? 02/04/09 12:55 Read: times |
#162043 - I have been following this Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Why is it you refuse to provide the information that I've requested several times? I'm willing to help, but I can't do it without information.
.... and since others have asked the relevant questions, I have seen no reason to post. Satish, you can not expect help with a post like "I have something thet must do something" We need specific information to help you. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Frequency Multiplication | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what is the wave form shape of the original signal? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, PLL is the most promising solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Easy integer approximation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wave Shape | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Constant speed? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Constant speed? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Constant speed? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Constant speed? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still some outstanding questions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Perhaps you're looking at the wrong motor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Rate Multiplier | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That might work ... but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Frequency multiplier | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How about some numbers? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Frequency Multiplier | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I was afraid that was the case ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Frequency Multipllication | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What about that logic card? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Frequency Multipiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why no further relevant information? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I have been following this | 01/01/70 00:00 |