Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
11/08/01 10:37
Read: times


 
#16423 - RE: ReG. reentrant functions
Hi Bhaskar,

reentrant functions should be avoided since stack usage grows rapidly on using those.
If the only reason was to use the function also inside an interrupt, it was more time and RAM saving, if this function was copied and renamed and this copy was used on interrupts.


Peter


List of 14 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
ReG. reentrant functions            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions - Peter            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions - Peter            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions - Peter            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions - Peter            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List