| ??? 11/08/01 10:37 Read: times |
#16423 - RE: ReG. reentrant functions |
Hi Bhaskar,
reentrant functions should be avoided since stack usage grows rapidly on using those. If the only reason was to use the function also inside an interrupt, it was more time and RAM saving, if this function was copied and renamed and this copy was used on interrupts. Peter |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| ReG. reentrant functions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: ReG. reentrant functions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: ReG. reentrant functions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: ReG. reentrant functions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: ReG. reentrant functions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: ReG. reentrant functions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: ReG. reentrant functions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: ReG. reentrant functions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: ReG. reentrant functions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: ReG. reentrant functions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: ReG. reentrant functions - Peter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: ReG. reentrant functions - Peter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: ReG. reentrant functions - Peter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: ReG. reentrant functions - Peter | 01/01/70 00:00 |



