Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
11/09/01 16:14
Read: times


 
#16484 - RE: ReG. reentrant functions - Peter
peter,

i agree that c programmers may be attracted to reentrant functions for silly reasons; i don't hire any c programmers for microprocessor work due to my opposition to this enabler of sloppy coding.

however, reentrant code is a necessary construct in many advanced applications most commonly understood being tree traversal algorithms. maybe its just my training in operations research (algorithms) that makes me crazy enough to use them in microprocessors.

there are ways of unfolding even reentrant functions supporting data structures so that no stack is used, but i don't post those secrets on any forum; those are earned in the classroom. :)

duh - c belongs on PCs only


List of 14 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
ReG. reentrant functions            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions - Peter            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions - Peter            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions - Peter            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: ReG. reentrant functions - Peter            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List