| ??? 06/19/09 11:10 Modified: 06/19/09 11:12 Read: times |
#166247 - Fair enough, then! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Sandeep Gupta said:
I am forced to use 8051 as we are working on a current running hardware based on 8051 Fair enough, then. But do you understand my point? If you were just starting out - with a "clean sheet" - then it would be foolish to try to shoe-horn such an application into such an inappropriate target when eminently more-suitable options are readily available. As noted elsewhere: Per Westermark said:
Another thing is of course to before starting a project consider exactly what your needs are, and from the start select a processor baseed on these needs.
http://www.8052.com/forum/read/166121 |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Code and XDatabanking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Manually handle a few large variables? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code and XDatabanking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You missed the point! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Do you *have* to use an 8051? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code and XDatabanking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Fair enough, then! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no banking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cross reference | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Verbiage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| P3_3 commonly for ROM and RAM to switch banks? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that will not work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Interference | 01/01/70 00:00 |