| ??? 06/19/09 11:16 Read: times |
#166248 - You missed the point! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
If you only have a few large variables that need to be banked, then you don't need to use Keil's banking at all - just do it "manually"
I have successfully used this approach before - where all the "normal" variables are managed by the compiler as non-banked, and there was just a "manual" bank-switch to access a 32K "bank" for data logging... |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Code and XDatabanking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Manually handle a few large variables? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code and XDatabanking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You missed the point! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Do you *have* to use an 8051? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code and XDatabanking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Fair enough, then! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no banking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cross reference | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Verbiage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| P3_3 commonly for ROM and RAM to switch banks? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that will not work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Interference | 01/01/70 00:00 |