| ??? 01/21/02 16:07 Read: times |
#18944 - RE: typedef & optimisation? |
On OT(9) it does not change anything in a compiled output from 2 versions (typedef, #define) of a source producing a 10K binary.
So I think the answer is no for Keil. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| typedef & optimisation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: typedef & optimisation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: typedef & optimisation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: typedef & optimisation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: typedef & optimisation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: typedef & optimisation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: typedef & optimisation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: typedef & optimisation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: typedef & optimisation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: typedef & optimisation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: typedef & optimisation? Derek | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: typedef & optimisation? Peter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: typedef & optimisation Franc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: typedef & optimisation? Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: typedef & optimisation? Peter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: typedef & optimisation? Peter/Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: typedef & optimisation? Peter/Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: typedef & optimisation? Peter/Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: typedef & optimisation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: typedef & optimisation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: typedef & optimisation? | 01/01/70 00:00 |



