| ??? 02/12/02 17:20 Read: times |
#19729 - RE: Tiny BASIC on a DS89C420 (A2 eng sample) |
Philip, Tom,
I don't use either basic so i am not speaking from experience. If Tiny Basic uses Timer 1 i would expect it to run on the '420. As i recall Tiny Basic is integer Basic. Review of intel's source for BASIC-52 (all i have although i know there are other "mod'd" versions) clearly shows the use of instruction cycle timing to determine bit rate so i am surprised that you got it running on reduced machine cycle per instruction devices. What am i missing? Did you use the intel source or another version? Philip, since you are modifying the source why not input your bit rate into timer two delay just a bit and then just "jam load" a character into SBUF and look to see if it outputs at the correct bit rate. I haven't looked at the source exhaustively but even if interrupts are off the "jam load" into SBUF will cause output to your terminal device. regards, p |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Tiny BASIC on a DS89C420 (A2 eng sample) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Tiny BASIC on a DS89C420 (A2 eng sample) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Tiny BASIC on a DS89C420 (A2 eng sample) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Tiny BASIC on a DS89C420 (A2 eng sample) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Tiny BASIC on a DS89C420 (A2 eng sample) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Tiny BASIC on a DS89C420 (A2 eng sample) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Tiny BASIC on a DS89C420 (A2 eng sample) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Tiny BASIC on a DS89C420 (A2 eng sample) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Tiny BASIC on a DS89C420 (A2 eng sample) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Tiny BASIC, BASIC-52 on a DS89C420 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Tiny BASIC on a DS89C420 (A2 eng sample) | 01/01/70 00:00 |



