| ??? 05/06/02 14:39 Read: times |
#22578 - RE: help on assembly => C conversion |
I suppose the best way to go around doing this would be to go through the assembly code and identify the overall functionality, the program structure, major loops, function calls etc. Get a rough pseudocode out of it...and then you will have to, as Erik said, rewrite the whole damn thing in C.
On the other hand, if you know what the program is supposed to do, dont waste time with the assembly code , just start coding in C. It will be much faster. kundi ;D |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| help on assembly => C conversion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: help on assembly => C conversion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: help on assembly => C conversion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: help on assembly => C conversion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: help on assembly => C conversion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: help on assembly => C conversion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: help on assembly => C conversion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: help on assembly => C conversion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: help on assembly => C conversion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: help on assembly => C conversion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: help on assembly => C .. Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: help on assembly => C .. Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 |



