| ??? 05/06/02 20:36 Read: times |
#22618 - RE: help on assembly => C .. Andy |
"I recently did some 'C' to assembler conversion for a Client: they weren't actualls changing the processor at the time, but doing a significant upgrade, and wanting the facility to later upgrade to a different processor"
"'C' to assembler" did you mean that ? In that case we are talking about an approach I have seen used which is to have working and maintained code in C, which just happens to be a bit too slow. Then for each upgrade some functions are converted into assembler. I do not believe (personal taste, not ironclad rule) this accomplishes anything, it is just as effective to maintain assembler for the speedoo functions as it is to convert C, even with a processor change. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| help on assembly => C conversion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: help on assembly => C conversion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: help on assembly => C conversion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: help on assembly => C conversion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: help on assembly => C conversion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: help on assembly => C conversion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: help on assembly => C conversion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: help on assembly => C conversion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: help on assembly => C conversion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: help on assembly => C conversion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: help on assembly => C .. Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: help on assembly => C .. Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 |



