| ??? 07/02/02 11:01 Read: times |
#25141 - RE: timer tick handling |
erik malund wrote: ------------------------------- You can still do it if all your present interrupts are the same priority. -- what if programmer wants 2 priority levels? say 0 for int0 and 1 for rs232.if i save them and put temporarily at priority1 and t0 at 0 then polling sequence shall process int0 first which is not what programmer wanted. regards pranav |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 |



