| ??? 07/02/02 11:20 Read: times |
#25143 - RE: timer tick handling |
You can still do it in a 2 level priority if all your present interrupts are the same priority.
-- what if programmer wants 2 priority levels Then you need a 4 level chip to do it. This is a neat trick to use when you can, if you can't you need other means. Does your RTOS allow a task to say "need no time now". Another possibility, if your RTOS allow it, would be to do, what I suggest done in a software interrupt, in a high priority non-preemptable task. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: timer tick handling | 01/01/70 00:00 |



