| ??? 08/19/02 14:20 Read: times |
#27508 - RE: C compiler for 8051/52 |
Luca
The use of the 'real' 'printf()' is truely obsolete, because it's sole argument is a constant (at the end of the loop it is always 10). So, if turned to the top, the 'printf("...%d..n",i)' might be replaced by 'puts("...10..")', just to blend the user... So I think you can't compare the "framework", only the pure algorithm. Another fact is, that some library functions might be coded in tricky assembler, which is not for uC/51 ('printf()' sources are supplied in C, do the others supply sourcecode too?) Jürgen |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| C compiler for 8051/52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C compiler for 8051/52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C compiler for 8051/52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C compiler for 8051/52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C compiler for 8051/52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C compiler for 8051/52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C compiler for 8051/52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C compiler for 8051/52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C compiler for 8051/52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C compiler for 8051/52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C compiler for 8051/52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C compiler for 8051/52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C compiler for 8051/52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C compiler for 8051/52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: C compiler for 8051/52, Ralf | 01/01/70 00:00 |



