| ??? 11/22/02 17:32 Read: times |
#32967 - RE: more than 16 bits timers ? Jez |
Yup, you still need a prescaler, but the point was that it's really easy to implement an n-bit counter in a CPLD. Besides, it's probably only a matter of time before they'll reach GHz performance. Lattice's MACH4000 series are already available at 400MHz...
Rob. PS. Jez, you really need to do something about that virus! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| more than 16 bits timers ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more than 16 bits timers ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more than 16 bits timers ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more than 16 bits timers ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more than 16 bits timers ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more than 16 bits timers ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more than 16 bits timers ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more than 16 bits timers ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more than 16 bits timers ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more than 16 bits timers ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more than 16 bits timers ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more than 16 bits timers ? Jez | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more than 16 bits timers ? Jez | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more than 16 bits timers ? Jez | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more than 16 bits timers ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: more than 16 bits timers ? | 01/01/70 00:00 |