| ??? 12/24/02 22:27 Read: times |
#34977 - RE: shaft decoder |
1.
If you build some logic within a CPLD then its many more reliable to synchronize all asynchroneous inputs with a master clock. Otherwise you have no control, how long / short the generated pulse duration was. And if you feed a pulse into a counter, which meet not the needed minimum duration, this counter reacts totally crazy. Also some metastable effects can occur. 2. Since today most sensors contain a µC and sends the output value over busses like RS-485 or CAN, there is no need to waste extra hardware for a job, which can easiliy be done inside the µC. E.g. I use the T89C51CC01 to read out two sensors and feed the 4 signals into 4 inputs of the capture unit. The I get an interrupt on every change of one of the 4 inputs and count up/down the X/Y counter values. Peter |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| shaft decoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: shaft decoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: shaft decoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: shaft decoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: shaft decoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: shaft decoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: shaft decoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: shaft decoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: shaft decoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: shaft decoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| VHDL definition reference. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: shaft decoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: shaft decoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: shaft decoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: shaft decoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: shaft decoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: shaft decoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: shaft decoder two types | 01/01/70 00:00 |



