| ??? 01/07/03 21:43 Read: times |
#35879 - RE: 8052 (or derivatives) serial port timing |
I see what you mean; when receiving a message, you really do need an independant timer to kick off at each received character. (You also need this to detect an aborted message (1.5 chara idle)). You haven't got one (you said)! Also, your question was purely regarding transmission - so you KNOW when it is the end of the message! Hence my endorsement of Erik's suggestion of using the UART timer after sending the message.
As Donald suggests, you don't have to get too precise about these delays. Dave |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 8052 (or derivatives) serial port timing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052 (or derivatives) serial port timing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052 (or derivatives) serial port timing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052 (or derivatives) serial port timing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052 (or derivatives) serial port timing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052 (or derivatives) serial port timing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052 (or derivatives) serial port timing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052 (or derivatives) serial port timing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052 (or derivatives) serial port timing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052 (or derivatives) serial port ti | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052 (or derivatives) serial port ti | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052 (or derivatives) serial port timing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052 (or derivatives) serial port timing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052 (or derivatives) serial port timing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8052 (or derivatives) serial port timing | 01/01/70 00:00 |